Baseball Articles | 2000 Post-Season Reviews

2000 Post-Season Review -- Anaheim Angels

By Tom Tippett
January 10, 2001

This article takes a look at how the Anaheim Angels performed in the 2000 season relative to pre-season expectations. For an overview of the approach used in this review, and a definition of some of the key terms and statistics, please see the overview page called 2000 Team-by-Team Performance Reviews.

Capsule Summary

                   Projected  Actual
Runs for              784      864
Runs allowed          842      869
Run Margin            -54       -5
Wins                   75       82
Pythagorean wins       75       81
Placement             4th      3rd

Two years ago, when the Angels signed Mo Vaughn, a lot of people picked Anaheim to win the division. But our computer simulations exposed some weaknesses and suggested that a third-place finish was more likely. They were even worse than that, as injuries, clubhouse turmoil, and some disappointing performances (especially from Darin Erstad) dropped them to 70 wins and the AL West cellar.

Coming off that dismal campaign, only a few brave souls thought Anaheim would escape a second-straight last-place finish in 2000. That's where they landed in our simulations, too, but it was a very respectable last-place finish. The projected run margin was only -54, meaning that a few pleasant surprises and a few breaks would be enough to put them into the mix in a division with no dominant teams. In fact, Anaheim won the division in two of the fifty simulations we ran of the 2000 season.

Things did indeed go well for this squad. The offense was much more potent than expected, and that was enough to overcome a slightly disappointing pitching staff and give them a winning record in each of the first four months. Seven games over .500 going into August, they still had a good shot at the division title or a wildcard berth. But some of their bats fell silent during the stretch run and the Angels faded to a 25-30 record the rest of the way.

Key Position Players

Led by Darin Erstad, Troy Glaus, and Tim Salmon, Anaheim scored 80 more runs than projected despite getting very little offense from the shortstop position and lacking a strong presence at DH. Injuries didn't hurt them -- Gary Disarcina was the only major casualty, and he wasn't going to hit much anyway -- and none of the regulars had a bad year. So I think it's fair to say that they couldn't reasonably expect to squeeze many more runs out of this lineup than they did. Their total of 864 runs was enough to rank them 7th in the league in runs scored after finishing second-last the year before.

Ben Molina, c, age 25

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana  90  22  4  0  1   8  12  1   5  0   6  0  0  .244  .289  .322  .611   8
Prorated   Ana 476 116 21  0  5  42  63  5  26  0  32  0  0  .244  .289  .322  .611  42
Actual     Ana 473 133 20  2 14  59  71  6  23  0  33  1  0  .281  .318  .421  .739  60

Entering spring training, it wasn't yet clear whether Molina was ready to be a good major-league hitter -- he had some terrific AA numbers but hadn't impressed at higher levels -- and he seemed destined to share the job with Matt Walbeck as he had done the year before. But he began the season as the starter, held the job through a shaky April, then caught fire with a .463 batting average in May and five homers in each of June and July. He doesn't walk much, but he's shown that he can hit for a decent average with moderate power, and he's one of the league's tougher hitters to strike out.

Matt Walbeck, c, age 30

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 457 116 16  2  7  48  46  3  43  1  78  3  3  .254  .320  .344  .663  49
Prorated   Ana 139  35  5  1  2  15  14  1  13  0  24  1  1  .254  .320  .344  .663  15
Actual     Ana 146  29  5  0  6  17  12  1   7  0  22  0  1  .199  .240  .356  .596  12

Walbeck didn't hit as the starter in 1999 (.240 with virtually no power) and was even worse as the backup last year. He's a career .237 hitter with who's never had a slugging average above .367, and his defense is nothing special. If he's able to stay in the majors, it will be as a backup. Cincinnati signed him to a minor-league contract in December.

Mo Vaughn, 1b/dh, age 32

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 582 168 23  1 29  81 102 11  69 10 138  0  0  .289  .373  .481  .854 106
Prorated   Ana 623 180 25  1 31  87 109 12  74 11 148  0  0  .289  .373  .481  .854 113
Actual     Ana 614 167 31  0 36  93 117 14  79 11 181  2  0  .272  .365  .498  .864 115

A year ago, I pointed out that Anaheim fans were in for a disappointment if they expected Vaughn to produce as well as he had with the Red Sox not so long ago. Two forces -- age and a much less favorable ballpark -- would be working against him. I figured I'd have to eat my words when Vaughn was sitting with a .318 batting average, 18 homers and 47 RBI at the end of May. But that was the high-water mark, and a terrible September brought his full season totals all the way down to the level he had been projected for. Vaughn has always been prone to strike out, but this was the first time that he challenged the all-time record (Bobby Bonds, 189) for Ks in a season.

Adam Kennedy, 2b, age 24

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 421 113 25  4  7  57  56  4  22  0  43 12  7  .268  .308  .397  .705  51
Prorated   Ana 594 160 35  6 10  80  79  6  31  0  61 17 10  .268  .308  .397  .705  72
Actual     Ana 598 159 33 11  9  82  72  3  28  5  73 22  8  .266  .300  .403  .703  71

Kennedy was acquired before the season in one of those "needs" trades that seems likely to work out well for both teams. Anaheim had a surplus of outfielders and by trading one of them (Jim Edmonds) hoped to fill two holes by acquiring a starting pitcher (Bottenfield) and plugging Kennedy into the void created by Randy Velarde's departure the year before. Like many of his teammates, Kennedy started quickly, batting .380 with 14 extra-base hits and 7 steals in April. A lousy May brought him back to earth, but he got back on track and finished up with a season right in line with expectations. He didn't come close to filling Randy Velarde's shoes, but it was a very respectable rookie season. And he is, after all, thirteen years younger than Velarde.

Troy Glaus, 3b, age 23

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 575 141 29  0 31  88  89  5  68  1 142  5  1  .245  .329  .457  .786  89
Prorated   Ana 599 147 30  0 32  92  93  5  71  1 148  5  1  .245  .329  .457  .786  93
Actual     Ana 563 160 37  1 47 120 102  2 112  6 163 14 11  .284  .404  .604 1.008 138

I think it's fair to say that Glaus has made the adjustment to big-league pitching. A college star, Glaus was promoted after only 109 games in the minors, where 35 homers in 407 atbats provided ample evidence that he had nothing more to prove. He showed flashes of greatness in 1999 when he started very quickly and banged out 29 homers in his first full season, but his batting average was depressed by a ton of strikeouts. Last year, he continued to whiff a lot, but great things happened when he didn't. It added up to 112 walks, the AL homerun title, and a .400 average when he put the ball in play. In the field, Glaus showed very good range but made 33 errors. If he can steady himself down a little, he could be an asset on defense, too.

Gary DiSarcina, ss, age 32

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 527 136 26  3  4  63  54  6  27  0  50  7  6  .258  .300  .342  .642  52
Prorated   Ana  39  10  2  0  0   5   4  0   2  0   4  1  0  .258  .300  .342  .642   4
Actual     Ana  38  15  2  0  1   6  11  1   1  0   3  0  1  .395  .425  .526  .951   8

In 1995, Disarcina earned a reputation as a key member of this team when he batted .307, played very good defense, and helped the team into the division lead. The fact that the club collapsed when Disarcina went down with an injury only served to reinforce that view. But Disarcina was able to get his on-base percentage over .300 only once from 1996 to 1999, and that's just not good enough these days.

To make matters worse, he missed the first half of 1999 with a broken arm, then saw his 2000 season wiped out by a pair of injuries -- a badly bruised thumb in April and rotator-cuff surgery in May. His shoulder is not expected to be ready until mid-April, so while it's too soon to say that his career is over, there's no guarantee that Disarcina will become a useful player again.

Benji Gil, ss, age 27

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana  67  14  3  0  1   9   8  1   5  0  15  1  1  .209  .270  .299  .569   6
Prorated   Ana 306  64 14  0  5  41  37  5  23  0  69  5  5  .209  .270  .299  .569  25
Actual     Ana 301  72 14  1  6  28  23  5  30  0  59 10  6  .239  .317  .352  .669  34

In 1995, Gil was the regular shortstop for Texas at the tender age of 22. Although he showed great range in the field, he made too many errors and did absolutely nothing at the plate. Kevin Elster took his job in 1996, and Gil got another shot in 1997 when Elster broke his wrist. Once again, Gil didn't hit, and he found himself in the minors in 1998-99. He got a chance last year when Disarcina went down, but the story hasn't changed. He still has good range, but he still doesn't hit enough, and he still makes too many errors.

Kevin Stocker, ss, age 30

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Tam 474 124 19  3  7  63  47  7  48  2  90 10  6  .262  .338  .359  .696  58
Prorated   Tam 121  32  5  1  2  16  12  2  12  1  23  3  2  .262  .338  .359  .696  15
Actual     Tam 114  30  7  1  2  20   8  2  19  0  27  1  2  .263  .378  .395  .773  17


Prorated   Ana 240  63 10  2  4  32  24  4  24  1  46  5  3  .262  .338  .359  .696  30
Actual     Ana 229  45 13  3  0  21  16  2  32  0  54  0  3  .197  .299  .279  .579  19


Prorated   Tot 361  94 14  2  5  48  36  5  37  2  69  8  5  .262  .338  .359  .696  44
Actual     Tot 343  75 20  4  2  41  24  4  51  0  81  1  5  .219  .326  .318  .644  36

Even though Stocker produced at his normal level, Tampa Bay released him after he made 11 errors in 38 starts. After Anaheim picked him up, Stocker was pretty steady in the field but didn't hit at all. He became a free agent after the season.

Darin Erstad, lf/cf, age 26

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 643 176 32  4 16  96  76  4  59  5 102 19  8  .274  .337  .411  .747  90
Prorated   Ana 675 185 34  4 17 101  80  4  62  5 107 20  8  .274  .337  .411  .747  94
Actual     Ana 676 240 39  6 25 121 100  1  64  9  82 28  8  .355  .409  .541  .951 154

A tale of two seasons. By the end of the 1998 season, Erstad had established himself as a rising star with a combination of excellent defense, above-average hitting, and the ability to steal 20 bases with a good success rate. Then he had a 1999 season that was one of the worst in the majors before turning things completely around with an outstanding 2000 campaign.

His combined performance in those two seasons -- .308, 18 homers per 600 atbats, 53 walks, 20 steals -- is right in line with what you would project for someone his age with his stats through 1998. So how should we interpret his 2000 season? As a breakout season that will establish him for years to come as a bona fide superstar? Or as proof that players can have season-long slumps and season-long streaks that average out in the long run?

Partly because he did most of his damage in the first half, I'm leaning toward the view that Erstad will drop back into the low .300s with moderate power and a normal walk rate. In other words, I think he'll be a very good (but not great) hitter, a terrific defensive player, and an asset to any team. But not a superstar.

Ron Gant, lf, age 35

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Phi 525 135 27  3 24  98  83  2  74  1 117 11  2  .257  .350  .457  .807  90
Prorated   Phi 334  86 17  2 15  62  53  1  47  1  75  7  1  .257  .350  .457  .807  57
Actual     Phi 343  87 16  2 20  54  38  1  36  1  73  5  4  .254  .324  .487  .811  53


Prorated   Ana  90  23  5  1  4  17  14  0  13  0  20  2  0  .257  .350  .457  .807  15
Actual     Ana  82  19  3  1  6  15  16  0  20  0  18  1  2  .232  .379  .512  .891  17


Prorated   Tot 424 109 22  2 19  79  67  2  60  1  94  9  2  .257  .350  .457  .807  72
Actual     Tot 425 106 19  3 26  69  54  1  56  1  91  6  6  .249  .335  .492  .827  71

Although Gant was having a decent season, it made sense for the slumping Phillies to dump his salary and open a position for Pat Burrell by dealing him to Anaheim for Kent Bottenfield at the trade deadline. Anaheim didn't get much out of Gant, but Bottenfield hadn't been pitching well, so they didn't give up all that much, either. After the season, Gant became a free agent and signed with Colorado.

Edgard Clemente, of/dh, age 24

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 256  57 11  1 10  30  34  1  17  0  62  2  2  .223  .273  .391  .663  26
Prorated   Ana  74  17  3  0  3   9  10  0   5  0  18  1  1  .223  .273  .391  .663   8
Actual     Ana  78  17  2  0  0   4   5  1   0  0  27  0  1  .218  .228  .244  .471   4

Clemente did nothing to remind fans of his late, great uncle Roberto last year. He didn't hit at AAA Edmonton or with the Angels, and he became a free agent after the season.

Orlando Palmeiro, of, age 31

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana  81  23  3  1  0  11   8  1  10  0   7  1  1  .284  .366  .346  .711  11
Prorated   Ana 252  72  9  3  0  34  25  3  31  0  22  3  3  .284  .366  .346  .711  35
Actual     Ana 243  73 20  2  0  38  25  2  38  0  20  4  1  .300  .395  .399  .794  42

Palmeiro picked up his game a little in 2000, matching or setting career highs in on-base percentage and slugging percentage. He hits for a good average, walks more often than he strikes out, and can handle himself defensively. But with only one homer in 966 career atbats, he'll never be more than a fourth or fifth outfielder.

Garret Anderson, cf, age 28

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 590 173 33  3 13  71  73  1  35  6  74  4  3  .293  .332  .425  .757  80
Prorated   Ana 637 187 36  3 14  77  79  1  38  6  80  4  3  .293  .332  .425  .757  87
Actual     Ana 647 185 40  3 35  92 117  0  24  5  87  7  6  .286  .307  .519  .827  93

It's not clear to me why our system projected him for only 13 homers after he hit 21 in 1999, but even so, there was absolutely nothing in Anderson's major-league or minor-league career that suggested that he would ever hit 35 homers. Before the break, he seemed to be swinging for the fences all the time -- he smacked 26 homers but his average plummeted to .246. After the break, he hit .334 but had only 9 more homers. And he didn't take walks at any time during the year. The net result was a season in which he created only a few more runs than expected. I would be surprised to see him reach 30 homers again next year.

Tim Salmon, rf, age 31

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 542 150 32  2 26  90 102  3  93  4 115  2  3  .277  .380  .487  .867 107
Prorated   Ana 569 157 34  2 27  94 107  3  98  4 121  2  3  .277  .380  .487  .867 112
Actual     Ana 568 165 36  2 34 108  97  6 104  5 139  0  2  .290  .404  .540  .945 128

Salmon has proven to be a very tough player in recent years. He played with a partially torn ligament in his foot (and a lot of pain) for most of 1998. He sprained his wrist attempting a diving catch in 1999. And last year Salmon battled a sore back, inflamed shoulder, a tight groin, a bruised thumb and tendinitis in his foot. Despite all that, Salmon matched or exceeded his career averages across the board and was a big reason why the Angels were in contention for much of the season. He had surgery on both his right foot and his left shoulder after the season, and if those procedures turn out to be completely successful, we'll have a chance to find out what he can do when he's healthy.

Jeff DaVanon, dh, age 26

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 453 119 22 10  9  87  54  3  56  2  87 20 11  .263  .345  .415  .760  67

A series of impressive minor league seasons led us to pencil DaVanon in as part of a DH platoon for 2000, but he tore the labrum in his left shoulder diving for a ball during a spring training game and wound up missing the entire season.

Scott Spiezio, dh/1b/3b, age 27

                AB   H 2B 3B HR   R RBI HP   W IW   K SB CS   AVG   OBP   SPC   OPS  RC
Projection Ana 259  67 15  1  8  36  37  2  31  2  37  0  1  .259  .340  .417  .757  37
Prorated   Ana 302  78 17  1  9  42  43  2  36  2  43  0  1  .259  .340  .417  .757  43
Actual     Ana 297  72 11  2 17  47  49  3  40  2  56  1  2  .242  .334  .465  .799  48

In March, we figured Spiezio might platoon at second with Kennedy, but he wound up filling in at first and third when he wasn't the DH. Although he turned a few more doubles into homeruns than he has in the past, his overall output was only a little above his career norms. Spiezio seems destined for a utility role; he doesn't hit well enough to be a regular at any position other than second, where Kennedy has the nod due to very good defense and acceptable hitting.

Key Pitchers

Last spring, in the wake of Chuck Finley's departure for Cleveland, it wasn't easy to cobble together a projected starting rotation from among this collection of injury-riddled veterans and inexperienced prospects. And that proved to be somewhat prophetic.

Sixteen (!) different pitchers started games for the Halos last year, and the final rotation bore little resemblance to the group that left spring training. A strong bullpen (second in the league in relief ERA) did its best to bail out all those starting pitchers, who were only 0.04 runs better than the Twins, who had the league's worst starting pitcher ERA. The result was a staff that ranked ninth in the AL in runs allowed.

Kent Bottenfield, starter, age 31

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  4.54  32 32  12 12  0  204 209 22  89 146  .266  .763
Prorated   Ana  4.54  20 20   8  8  0  130 133 14  57  93  .266  .763
Actual     Ana  5.71  21 21   7  8  0  128 144 25  56  75  .285  .850


Prorated   Phi  4.54   7  7   3  3  0   44  45  5  19  32  .266  .763
Actual     Phi  4.50   8  8   1  2  0   44  41  5  21  31  .240  .711


Prorated   Tot  4.54  27 27  10 10  0  174 178 19  76 125  .266  .763
Actual     Tot  5.40  29 29   8 10  0  172 185 30  77 106  .274  .815

After he went 18-7 for the Cardinals in 1999, it was no surprise when Bottenfield was penciled in as the ace of the Angels staff when he arrived in the Jim Edmonds trade. But that win-loss record was misleading in two ways. First, one doesn't normally win 18 games with an ERA (3.97) that was only half a run per game below the league average; it was unlikely that he'd get six runs per game of run support again in 2000. Second, he didn't pitch all that well anyway -- more than a hit per inning, 4.2 walks per game, and 21 homers allowed.

Taking this into account along with his move to a DH league, Bottenfield was projected for a modest 12-12 record and an ERA in the mid-4's. He was more or less on track to match that projection when he tried to pitch through a sore shoulder and saw his ERA balloon to 7.48 in June (7 homers allowed in 21 innings). He was traded back to the NL (Philly) for Ron Gant at the trade deadline, then declared free agency after the season and signed with Houston for 2001.

Ken Hill, starter, age 34

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  4.96  32 32   8 14  0  185 200 18  99 107  .279  .792
Prorated   Ana  4.96  15 15   4  6  0   84  91  8  45  49  .279  .792
Actual     Ana  6.52  16 16   5  7  0   79 102 16  53  50  .323  .928


Prorated   ChA  4.96   1  1   0  0  0    4   5  0   2   2  .279  .792
Actual     ChA 24.00   2  1   0  1  0    3   5  0   6   0  .455 1.429


Prorated   Tot  4.96  15 15   4  7  0   89  96  9  47  51  .279  .792
Actual     Tot  7.16  18 17   5  8  0   82 107 16  59  50  .327  .947

One of the game's better starting pitchers in the first half of the nineties, Hill has battled injuries (shoulder, elbow) and hasn't been the same pitcher for the past four years. (I wonder if the 250 innings he threw in 1996 had anything to do with his subsequent struggles.) Nothing much went right last year, either, as his control vanished, he gave up a ton of homers, spent seven weeks on the DL (torn rib cage muscle), and was released in early August. He's a free agent now.

Jason Dickson, starter, age 27

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.25  32 32   8 14  0  189 220 25  62  99  .293  .808
Prorated   Ana  5.25   5  5   1  2  0   28  33  4   9  15  .293  .808
Actual     Ana  6.11   6  6   2  2  0   28  39  5   7  18  .336  .896

In 1997, Dickson was a very impressive 13-9 in his first full season, logging 203 innings despite occasional elbow and shoulder problems. He didn't pitch well the next year, then missed all of 1999 after shoulder surgery. He began last year in the rotation, but that didn't last long. He went on the DL with a strained hip flexor and discovered more damage to his shoulder while trying to make it back from the hip injury. Dickson's shoulder was operated on again, and that was that for the season and for his Anaheim career. Toronto recently signed this Canadian hurler to a minor-league deal for 2001.

Jarrod Washburn, starter, age 25

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.01  26 26   7 11  0  153 162 22  66 105  .272  .801
Prorated   Ana  5.01  13 13   4  6  0   77  81 11  33  53  .272  .801
Actual     Ana  3.74  14 14   7  2  0   84  64 16  37  49  .215  .717

Washburn didn't join the rotation until May because of a sprained rib cage muscle, but he pitched very well for the most part. He left his May 29th start with a tight shoulder after throwing five no-hit innings, then got shelled six days later. After that, Washburn settled down and pitched very well until his season was ended in early August by a stress fracture in his left shoulder. I'm very impressed with the .215 average he held opposing hitters to, but his walk/strikeout ratio and tendency to give up the longball make me think he's still got some work to do to become a solid major-league starter.

Tim Belcher, starter, age 38

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.28  22 22   6  9  0  130 147 20  46  66  .287  .821
Prorated   Ana  5.28   7  7   2  3  0   42  48  7  15  21  .287  .821
Actual     Ana  6.86   9  9   4  5  0   41  45  8  22  22  .281  .892

After a very disappointing 1999 season, the Angels were hoping that Belcher would come back strong in 2000 after undergoing elbow surgery in December. The club knew he'd miss the first month of the season, but it turned out that he wasn't ready until mid-June. Two good starts were followed by two horrible ones and a return to the DL when his elbow flared up again in early July. He made it back into the rotation in September, when he pitched well against three of the weaker hitting teams in the league and got hammered by two of the better ones. His last good season was 1996.

Scott Schoeneweis, starter, age 26

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  6.28   5  5   1  2  0   29  37  5  11  18  .319  .897
Prorated   Ana  6.28  29 29   6 11  0  164 211 29  63 103  .319  .897
Actual     Ana  5.45  27 27   7 10  0  170 183 21  67  78  .276  .783

Schoeneweis was a starter in the minors but spent his first major-league season (1999) in the pen. He started well (4-0, 3.15 in April) but faded quickly and wound up around the league average for AL starting pitchers. He pitched a little better than his ERA indicated.

It's hard to say how good he can be in the future; his walk-strikeout ratios were better than 2:1 in the minors but barely 1:1 so far in the big leagues. Didn't allow a stolen base in 39 innings in his rookie season, but was pretty easy to run on (20 for 25) last year.

Ramon Ortiz, starter, age 24

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.14   6  6   2  3  0   35  37  6  17  32  .272  .818
Prorated   Ana  5.14  18 18   6  9  0  106 112 18  51  97  .272  .818
Actual     Ana  5.09  18 18   8  6  0  111  96 18  55  73  .236  .747

One of the more promising pitchers in the Angels system, Ortiz began the season on the DL with a slight tear in the labrum of his throwing shoulder but missed only about a week of action. He struggled with his control early and was sent down to AAA after six starts. He was back for good in mid-August and pitched pretty well, though his ERA ballooned as a result of two outings in which he allowed 17 earned runs in 6-1/3 innings.

His minor league record shows good control, plenty of strikeouts, and less than a hit per inning, so there's a lot of upside here. And you'd have to believe he'd be further along in his development had he not missed most of the 1998 season with a fractured elbow.

Brian Cooper, starter, age 25

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  6.35   3  3   1  1  0   17  21  3   7  13  .309  .906
Prorated   Ana  6.35  15 15   5  5  0   86 107 15  36  66  .309  .906
Actual     Ana  5.90  15 15   4  8  0   87 105 18  35  36  .300  .895

Cooper spent two years in A ball and was a little better the second year. He was terrible in his first year in AA (1998) and improved in his second season at that level (his stats were dramatically better but aided by a change from a hitter-friendly to pitcher-friendly league, so the real improvement was less substantial than it appears).

In 16 starts in AAA beginning late in 1999, his ERA is over six, and he has yet to have any success in the majors. Can he repeat his pattern of improving after a one-year adjustment period? Maybe, maybe not. The good news is that his walk-strikeout ratios have been excellent throughout his minor-league career -- generally less than three walks and more than eight strikeouts per nine innings. The bad news is that his strikeout rate has fallen sharply since he reached AAA, so he may not have enough to get the better hitters out.

Seth Etherton, starter, age 23

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.50   3  3   1  1  0   18  20  3   6  14  .286  .809
Prorated   Ana  5.50  10 10   3  3  0   62  69 10  21  48  .286  .809
Actual     Ana  5.52  11 11   5  1  0   60  68 16  22  32  .278  .885

The Angels top draft pick in 1998, Etherton has moved quickly through the system. Like the other young pitchers in this organization, his minor league record contains some encouraging (though not dominant) performances. Given that he found himself in the majors after only 13 AAA starts, it shouldn't come as a surprise that he struggled a little. He'll get more chances, but he may be a couple of years away from being a good big-league starter.

Scott Karl, starter, age 28

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Col  6.73  19 19   5  8  0  107 146 16  40  58  .329  .896
Prorated   Col  6.73  12 12   3  5  0   69  94 10  26  37  .329  .896
Actual     Col  7.68  17  9   2  3  0   66  95 14  33  29  .343  .985


Prorated   Ana  6.73   4  4   1  2  0   23  31  3   9  12  .329  .896
Actual     Ana  6.65   6  4   2  2  0   22  31  2  12   9  .337  .903


Prorated   Tot  6.73  16 16   4  7  0   92 125 14  34  50  .329  .896
Actual     Tot  7.42  23 13   4  5  0   87 126 16  45  38  .341  .964

Karl has always given up a lot more hits than innings pitched, so you had to feel for him when he was dealt to the Rockies before the 2000 season. As expected, he was knocked around there and was let go in August. Anaheim gave him a shot, but he wasn't any better, and he'll try his hand in San Diego next year.

Matt Wise, starter, age 24

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  6.88   3  3   1  2  0   17  22  3   6  11  .319  .913
Prorated   Ana  6.88   6  6   2  4  0   36  46  6  13  23  .319  .913
Actual     Ana  5.54   8  6   3  3  0   37  40  7  13  20  .272  .780

Yet another young pitcher who got his first shot at the majors in 2000. Wise's 1999 season was ended by elbow surgery, but he bounced back and earned his shot by pitching well at AAA Edmonton last year. He acquitted himself well in six starts before being shut down in early September with more pain in that elbow. He'll get more chances as long as his elbow is OK.

Kent Mercker, reliever/starter, age 32

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.34  70  0   4  7  1   94 108 11  39  49  .290  .808
Prorated   Ana  5.34  38  0   2  4  1   51  58  6  21  26  .290  .808
Actual     Ana  6.52  21  7   1  3  0   48  57 12  29  30  .300  .949

Too many walks, too many homers, and a complete inability to get right-handed batters out. A lefty like Mercker isn't going to last long pitching that way. But that's not the real story here.

Mercker suffered a cerebral hemorrhage while pitching on May 11th and was in danger of losing his life. Remarkably, he returned to action three months later. He didn't pitch all that well, but who cares? He was alive and kicking and practicing his craft once again.

He signed with the Red Sox last week, who may be thinking of him as a lefty reliever now that Rheal Cormier and Jeff Fassero have moved on to other teams. Mercker did have some success getting lefties out last year.

Al Levine, reliever/starter, age 32

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  4.60  53  0   3  4  0   74  76 10  27  34  .267  .767
Prorated   Ana  4.60  71  0   4  5  0  100 102 13  36  46  .267  .767
Actual     Ana  3.87  51  5   3  4  2   95  98 10  49  42  .266  .767

A late bloomer, Levine didn't make his big-league debut until he was 28, and didn't pitch all that well in his first two seasons. He began to turn the corner with Texas in 1998 and has now posted two solid seasons for Anaheim, chewing up a lot of effective innings in long relief.

Mark Petkovsek, reliever, age 34

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  4.67  40  0   2  3  0   54  65  6  18  28  .302  .817
Prorated   Ana  4.67  57  0   3  4  0   77  92  9  26  40  .302  .817
Actual     Ana  4.22  64  1   4  2  2   81  86  8  23  31  .277  .752

Along with Levine, Petkovsek has given the Angels some badly-needed innings in long relief for the past two seasons. He pitched more effectively in the first half than in the second (OPSs of .691 and .805), but his half-season ERAs were just the opposite (5.18 and 3.29), serving as a reminder that it's best not to focus too much on ERA when you're trying to evaluate relief pitchers. After the season, Petkovsek became a free agent and signed with Texas.

Mike Fyhrie, reliever, age 30

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  4.98  23  0   2  3  0   47  49  6  21  31  .269  .773
Prorated   Ana  4.98  24  0   2  3  0   50  52  6  22  33  .269  .773
Actual     Ana  2.39  32  0   0  0  0   53  54  4  15  43  .269  .698

There's no question that Fyhrie improved his game last year, but don't get too carried away by that 2.39 ERA. His underlying stats are more consistent with an ERA in the mid-threes. Nevertheless, he was a valuable member of the bullpen. Oddly, this right-hander was much better against lefties (.222 average with no homers in 81 atbats).

Shigetoshi Hasegawa, setup/closer, age 31

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  4.52  70  0   4  6  2   98  96 14  37  64  .257  .752
Prorated   Ana  4.52  69  0   4  6  2   97  95 14  37  63  .257  .752
Actual     Ana  3.57  66  0  10  6  9   96 100 11  38  59  .270  .750

Because relievers don't throw a lot of innings, their seasonal ERAs can be quite volatile, and Hasegawa is a good example. His four seasons with Anaheim have produced ERAs of 3.93, 3.14, 4.91 and 3.57 while his underlying stats have been more stable than that. As you can see in the table, Hasegawa allowed a few more hits and three fewer homers than projected, but his ERA was almost a run lower than expected. That's usually a sign that a pitcher had some luck on his side.

Mike Holtz, lefty specialist, age 27

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  4.36  53  0   2  3  0   54  55  6  27  52  .267  .772
Prorated   Ana  4.36  39  0   1  2  0   40  41  4  20  38  .267  .772
Actual     Ana  5.05  61  0   3  3  0   41  37  4  18  40  .248  .680

Holtz's season is a mirror image of Hasegawa's in that he pitched a little better than expected but saw his ERA come in three-quarters of a run above the projected level. Despite the five-plus ERA, Holtz did his job well, holding lefties to a .213 average. His stats would normally produce an ERA in the 3.80 range.

Lou Pote, reliever, age 28

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.90  30  0   1  4  0   50  61  8  21  34  .303  .868
Prorated   Ana  5.90  29  0   1  4  0   48  58  8  20  32  .303  .868
Actual     Ana  3.40  32  1   1  1  1   50  52  4  17  44  .267  .703

Pote's projected stats were quite poor because he gave up a lot of hits as a starter in AA and AAA in the two seasons leading up to his big-league debut as a reliever in 1999, and because his strong performance as a reliever involved only 29 innings. But Pote pitched quite well in relief again this year, both at AAA and with the Angels, and it may be that he's much better suited to that role.

Derrick Turnbow, mopup man, age 22

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  5.70  23  0   2  2  0   30  36  5  15  24  .300  .880
Prorated   Ana  5.70  30  0   3  3  0   39  47  7  20  31  .300  .880
Actual     Ana  4.74  24  1   0  0  0   38  36  7  36  25  .254  .860

If you're ever in the market for a mopup man, this is the guy. In 19 of his 23 relief appearances, he entered the game with his team down by four runs or more. He was entrusted with four leads, but three of them were leads of nine or more runs. Only once was he brought into a close game -- a two-run lead against the White Sox on September 3rd when the rest of the bullpen had been used up by a series of blowouts -- and he responded by allowing a solo homer in one inning and picking up a Hold. His reward for this performance? Five more days on the bench before being asked to protect a seven-run deficit.

Turnbow was a Rule 5 pick last December, so the Angels had to keep him on the roster or risk losing him. He was in A ball the year before, so it made perfect sense to use him in non-pressure situations. Now that he has served his mandatory season on the big-league roster, they can send him down for more seasoning.

It's amazing that he was able to make it through the year with a 4.74 ERA after walking a man an inning, putting 72 runners on base in 38 innings, and giving up a homer every five innings.

Troy Percival, closer, age 30

                 ERA   G GS   W  L  S  INN   H HR  BB   K   AVG   OPS
Projection Ana  2.62  70  0   5  5 38   76  53  8  35  83  .196  .638
Prorated   Ana  2.62  49  0   4  4 27   53  37  6  25  58  .196  .638
Actual     Ana  4.50  54  0   5  5 32   50  42  7  30  49  .228  .731

Long established as one of the best closers in the league, we began to see some warning signs in Percival's game in the latter stages of 1999. He's still an effective pitcher, but the trend is definitely in the wrong direction -- more walks, higher batting average allowed -- and he blew ten saves in 42 chances. He spent three weeks in August on the DL with a sore elbow, and the time off may have been just what the doctor ordered. After his return, he posted an ERA of 3.27 with seven saves in eight chances.

Outlook

The team began handing the reins to a crop of young pitchers who will be expected to carry the load as early as this year. The only free agent pitchers they've added are Pat Rapp and Ismael Valdes, two pitchers who can be expected to add depth to the staff but who weren't any better than the Angels kids last year. I think it would be asking too much for this group to make a big step forward next year, but with the experience gained by the youngsters in 2000 and the possibility that Valdes could bounce back, a small step forward is quite possible.

Offensively, their production bounced back to the level it was at before their 1999 collapse. I figure the offense needs to add another 75 runs or so if this team is going to contend for a division title in 2001. Can they do that? On the positive side, they scored only 7 more runs than the league average despite finishing with the league's 5th best batting average, 6th best on-base percentage, and the top slugging average. The same level of production could easily produce more runs next year. On the other hand, they were only in the middle of the pack in scoring despite very good health, a couple of career years, and no bad seasons from any of the regulars. They may not be so lucky next year.

In short, the Angels look like a team that could easily be in the thick of the wildcard race but is probably an ace pitcher and a year away from a serious run at the division title.

Projections and text: Copyright © 2000-2001. Diamond Mind, Inc. All rights reserved.
Actual 2000 statistics: Copyright © 2000. STATS, Inc. All rights reserved.